Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:21:45 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: Colin Percival <cperciva@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_prot.c src/sys/sys systm.h Message-ID: <200407190921.45189.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.1.20040716143932.040665d0@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <200407161557.i6GFvGWg003796@repoman.freebsd.org> <200407161542.40585.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <6.1.0.6.1.20040716143932.040665d0@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 16 July 2004 05:44 pm, Colin Percival wrote: > At 12:42 16/07/2004, John Baldwin wrote: > >On Friday 16 July 2004 11:57 am, Colin Percival wrote: > >> Log: > >> Add a SUSER_RUID flag to suser_cred. This flag indicates that we want > >> to check if the *real* user is the superuser (vs. the normal behaviour, > >> which checks the effective user). > > > >Could we rename PRISON_ROOT to SUSER_PRISONOK or some such to be > > consistent? > > I'd be happy to do this; should I simply add the new name, or should I > make the substitution across the entire tree? I would ask Robert's opinion. :) I would vote for adding the new name and changing it across the tree and add in a #define for the old name that is inside #ifdef OBSOLETE_IN_6 or some such so it is deprecated for 5.x and gone in 6.0. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407190921.45189.jhb>