Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:08:19 +0200 From: infoomatic <infoomatic@gmx.at> To: Dewayne <dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ZFS native encryption safe to use? Message-ID: <6b741e03-732e-f1b8-6340-0a8897fb8235@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <f286ee12-8688-9a16-2c5e-e11fda8334f7@heuristicsystems.com.au> References: <NcUuVT_--3-9@tutanota.com> <0e7d2657-f857-01a8-f764-33b9c62c11f1@netfence.it> <de460855-d2a8-3125-1b64-bf5052e1e6ea@gmx.at> <f286ee12-8688-9a16-2c5e-e11fda8334f7@heuristicsystems.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24.08.23 00:43, Dewayne wrote: > Thx for the performance hint.=C2=A0 Were you using the same cipher on ea= ch? Yes, I have tried various combinations, but the difference was so huge that I did not let the benchmarks finish cause I felt it was wasted time and resources! > On 23/08/2023 5:34 pm, infoomatic wrote: >> last time (when 13.0 was released) I compared them: >> >> *) GELI + normal zfs was significantly faster than encrypted-zfs >> *) encrypted zfs to share files between Linux and FreeBSD did not work >> properly, resulting in Files non-readable on FreeBSD >>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6b741e03-732e-f1b8-6340-0a8897fb8235>