From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 10:58:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0EC106566C; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdlists-ruby@chillibear.com) Received: from mail.sundive.org (mail.sundive.org [212.13.197.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D0E8FC15; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 179.218.125.91.gr7.adsl.brightview.com ([91.125.218.179] helo=[192.168.0.44]) by sundive.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PznvC-000979-Rm; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:25:48 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:24:05 +0000 From: Eric To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: making Ruby 1.9 default Thread-Index: AcvjxEa75s3ByU1z9kuWSnsrsrh+wg== In-Reply-To: <4D7FEFC5.6050203@FreeBSD.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam: No X-bounce-key: sundive.org-1; freebsdlists-ruby@chillibear.com; 1300273203; 7616aa3f; Cc: Steve Wills Subject: Re: making Ruby 1.9 default X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:58:35 -0000 > From: Steve Wills [SNIP] > Ruby 1.9.x has been the "current stable version" of Ruby (according to > ruby-lang.org) since April 21, 2009 (at least according to my reading of > the WebBack machine). It seems to me it would be really nice to get Ruby > 1.9 as the default version by 9.0. Does that seem reasonable to everyone > else? If so, I'd like to do some work towards making that happen. [SNIP] I've personally been a bit snowed under with work recently, but I'm very happy to help you out where possible on this, generating patches, etc. > Am I crazy? Barking up the wrong tree, etc? Any input would be appreciated. No that all sounds very sensible to my mind. It does seem to be a good idea to get the Ruby default up to 1.9.x in time for a FreeBSD 9 release, I've no idea if that is really practical, I vaguely remember reading somewhere that release was planned for May(ish). Regards Eric