From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep 22 13:35:35 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA00326
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 13:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA00287
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.6/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA17535; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 14:35:16 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199609222035.OAA17535@rover.village.org>
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD 
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Sep 1996 16:30:05 EDT."
		<Pine.OSF.3.95.960922162853.31943D-100000@packet.eng.umd.edu> 
References: <Pine.OSF.3.95.960922162853.31943D-100000@packet.eng.umd.edu>  
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 14:35:15 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Pine.OSF.3.95.960922162853.31943D-100000@packet.eng.umd.edu> Chuck Robey writes:
: I don't think it would break anything in ports.

I have gone ahead and implemented this, and will commit it if there
appears to be support for this.  If any would like to review my
patches, ping me and I'll be happy to send them along.

Warner