From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 16:40:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A3A16A4CE; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:40:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB0943D54; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB3Gehag062467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:40:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:40:50 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20041203114050.0e4ede5d@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20041203144129.GA9061@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20041128202656.GL750@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041128212851.GB48499@freebsdmall.com> <20041202201016.GL753@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041202202912.GC55779@freebsdmall.com> <20041202203848.GI17393@daemon.li> <20041202210312.GB61027@freebsdmall.com> <20041203144129.GA9061@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Doc BoF at EuroBSDCon X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:40:45 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:41:30 +0200 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2004-12-02 13:03, Murray Stokely wrote: > > Just count my vote against removing the chapter directories. I was > > alarmed by the suggestion, then I saw two votes against it in this > > thread, and merely wanted to state that unless others speak up it > > appears we have consensus against his proposal. > > Directories are not evil per se. As mentioned before, the src tree uses > subdirectories quite effectively for a long time. The ports too. There > is no reason why we can't hack around the make infrastructure bits to > support arbitrary levels of nesting. > > Just my humble opinion, And I (others too perhaps) thank you for it. -- Tom Rhodes