From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 04:00:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23A85E2 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail5.networktest.com (mail5.networktest.com [204.109.60.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7872C4C for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D1D2FCCA0 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail5.networktest.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail5.networktest.com [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76080-08 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tejay.local (cpe-172-249-28-59.socal.res.rr.com [172.249.28.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 356122FCC96 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:54 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:00:02 -0000 On 10/30/13 7:10 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as > before or switch to using binary packages only. Is this really an "or" or is it an "and"? For example, can a system use binary packages for most things, but use portmaster or portupgrade on those ports where some special config options are needed? thanks dn