Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 08:58:36 -0600 From: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com> To: Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de> Cc: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert), hackers@freebsd.org (Hackers; FreeBSD) Subject: Re: using ddb to debug a double-panic? Message-ID: <199603131458.IAA01244@jake.lodgenet.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:54:08 %2B0700." <199603131057.LAA25407@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey writes: >>> Seriously, Bruce (or anybody else): what kind of editing? The main >>> objection I have to vi-style editing in shells is that it is so >>> ESC-intensive. I suspect it's also more difficult to program, though >>> I don't suppose that's the real problem. If anybody has any >>> alternatives to emacs-style bindings, please let me know a detailed >>> description of how it should work. I'm definitly in favor of emacs-bindings, even the vi lovers here hate the vi-mode in ksh,bash,... > >> 4) Abort key (^C): discard edits, new input line. > >OK, I suppose. kill (^u), even works when typing a passwd, I use this one lots. werase (^w), this one is pretty handy too. oh, yea please remember that this is a kernel debugger, it's not supposed to be too friendly :) > >Greg > eric. -- erich@lodgenet.com erich@rrnet.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603131458.IAA01244>