From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 5 06:31:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA29366 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 06:31:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA29360 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 06:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0tjRwp-0003x0C; Mon, 5 Feb 96 06:31 PST Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA02003; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:31:14 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: haury@sagem.fr cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTM: evolutions of ctm In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Feb 1996 15:20:03 +0100." <199602051420.PAA23016@sagem.fr> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 15:31:13 +0100 Message-ID: <2001.823530673@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > WARNING : in this patch release, SUBSUFF and TMPSUFF are not modified in ctm. h : > > #define SUBSUFF "#ctm" > #define TMPSUFF ".ctm" > > According to your mail, these should be changes as : > > #define SUBSUFF ".ctm" > #define TMPSUFF ".ctmtmp" > Yes, I did that on purpose. Didn't you say that it would be easier to write make rules if we used ".ctm" instead of "#ctm" ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.