From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 19 11:29:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5276B16A481; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDD943D48; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:29:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fh3Az-00066e-Ec; Fri, 19 May 2006 15:29:49 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fh3BT-000A8h-H9; Fri, 19 May 2006 15:30:19 +0400 To: Edwin Groothuis References: <200605190910.k4J9AthA057344@freefall.freebsd.org> <24823738@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519102325.GF1116@k7.mavetju> <58748084@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519110250.GB1103@k7.mavetju> <20060519110817.GU93253@droso.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:30:19 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060519110817.GU93253@droso.net> (Erwin Lansing's message of "Fri, 19 May 2006 13:08:17 +0200") Message-ID: <15866244@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/97488: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:29:56 -0000 On Fri, 19 May 2006 13:08:17 +0200 Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:02:50PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > If I assign it to portmgr for a repocopy, I'll get the PR back in > > my lap when the repocopy is done, not netchild@. In the mean time > > (and sorry for the noise), netchild is old and wise enough to know > > how to assign this PR back to himself :-) > > > Repocopies are special. There is no real concept of a maintainer as > after the repocopy, in principle, it's a new port and could have another > maintainer as the old one. Also, when the PR is assigned to portmgr, > portmgr will need a committer to sign the PR back to after the repocopy > is done. > I'd say, if the PR originator is a committer, just sign it right over to Maybe to assign it to originator, who'll assign it to portmgr? > portmgr. If not, assign to the maintainer and/or wait for a committer to > pick it up. Agreed. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider