Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:50:11 GMT From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly Message-ID: <201011201850.oAKIoBcn094109@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/148777; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: joeb <joeb@a1poweruser.com> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:43:38 +0300 "joeb" <joeb@a1poweruser.com> writes: > There are many existing ports with no distinfo so I fail to see why you > think this is an error. This was done on purpose so I can update the dist > file with fixes or enactments without having to wait for months to get the > update commented because the makesum values have changed. This technique is > communally used when the port make files will never change but allows the > maintainer to maintain the product without delays in moving updates into the > existing port. Then mark it RESTRICTED as the distfile may not be identical across ftp mirrors and CDROM. > And when it comes to the messing with /etc/rc.d/jail file I was told by the > jail maintainer that he was addressing the bugs I pointed out in a up coming > release and that I should just replace it with my corrected one as part of > my port. So that is what I am doing. Have you tried to rename it and install into PREFIX/etc/rc.d? The port fails to restore original /etc/rc.d/jail upon deinstall and jail.original ends up overwritten after second install.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011201850.oAKIoBcn094109>