Date: 18 Nov 1999 14:45:16 +0200 From: Vadim Belman <voland@plab.ku.dk> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pwd_mkdb max uid warning. Message-ID: <85ogcs0y03.fsf@dialup90.apex.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn's message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:37:15 %2B0200" References: <20034.942928635@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Sheldon!
On 18 Nov 99 at 14:37, "Sheldon" (Sheldon Hearn) wrote:
>> But merely for satisfying my curiosity, what are you gonna do with vipw
>> and pw? Being called implicitly pwd_mkdb will warn you anyway.
Sheldon> That was one of the reasons I wanted an envorinment variable, but
Sheldon> I was warned off that idea by bde.
Why? What reasons make this solution unacceptable?
--
/Voland Vadim Belman
E-mail: voland@plab.ku.dk
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85ogcs0y03.fsf>