From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 26 14:34:47 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809DF106564A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B468FC12
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type;
	bh=CpKmqtGkQPLAOxPZnmk6KWDwOjEa7yJ61RXlDEAXPzA=; 
	b=IScDAB4LxoXcUD+ExOSZKnLUBV/9yuU2ZPTBSHORKGuQFMO56/AS5C2Z09w7rv5eoo3ayWR38ScxMKnzaWBdoI/akfoaxfuLI/TQsXygIOc0vuM+ApPhbhWL9ZDJa4N8;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>) id 1SjWqn-000Dr8-W7
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:34:47 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1340721275-94480-94479/5/57; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:34:35
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <4FE8E4A4.9070507@gmail.com>
	<20120626065732.GH41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu>
	<4FE96BA0.6040005@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<4FE97008.2060501@netfence.it>
	<4FE97AE1.9080109@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<4FE9817C.7020905@netfence.it>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:34:35 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wgilfxbv34t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <4FE9817C.7020905@netfence.it>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD)
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Subject: Re: Port system "problems"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:34:47 -0000

On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:31:40 -0500, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>  
wrote:

>
> The "effort" will be 3x processing time for portupgrade (or whatever) to  
> update the package database 3 times as much as before.

pkgng uses sqlite. Please provide proof that it is as slow or slower than  
our current package database is.