From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 10 20:22:36 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC690FD5CD3 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 20:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wes.frazier@members.fsf.org) Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.posteo.de", Issuer "StartCom Class 3 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50BDB763D0 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 20:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wes.frazier@members.fsf.org) Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C17120B94 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 22:22:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 40hl5N38ykz9rxP for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 22:22:32 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: wes.frazier@members.fsf.org Subject: Re: Possible patch for games/gnurobots but don't know what to do next. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8063cd27-1d87-2c3e-8eab-920301338882@members.fsf.org> From: Wes Frazier Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=wes.frazier@members.fsf.org; keydata= xsBNBFnkGS8BCADFsuOK5MoYG9ngr5avBVEZ3M2YWFYqhFnrnegeC6gFP7CEEEhFlAlGFRJa 2lomWr9vkG19OpxtbiJVnXfmgquN5niDm3rx00So2EmpspHIp8/mOFE7Gx8tupQcOU6kVt4A 7i3U4KF+E1adev2BzVTxLOJPoaKRsA+puHdPH8jZ1a3y0YEtvLF8UUKiSEsECrjk30fQVKEl pGwNZUk5T30zWQWEIJXdYSviCbJmbzbf8DUQbHAxfcADYbMPm83XIOo14YbBjym8owNP1zhF M8ZOOxI0tQSh8Y+5U9Yn7pCm4FbIflLAIfV2dpoqeLgjQjOUDna+bo0HaWDt1bQQtUczABEB AAHNKVdlcyBGcmF6aWVyIDx3ZXMuZnJhemllckBtZW1iZXJzLmZzZi5vcmc+wsB/BBMBCAAp BQJZ5BkvAhsDBQkCky4ABwsJCAcDAgEGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQFO57iiyrSi6Q KAf+Pv/4HBh7Pk/NpjwaxdwK4Sxd4kO54VwcEcNmeGKMLPqD3ctDslETRBPyzA5Uvyckn5cE 6B8CbNKPEzpRRgr0kDHT5lzoHFaaubnl5ncYe419HMs8Dk3PXpwkjZ8KMotzJFvNVaaZ7Q7X B+r4godvMkDIZAz9GDBbyHKeK/1yqWQgquWJ7vxf2wSWWE6NqqENgcXQNUp54Ay4H+r3qEhT E72xbKFycmZ9idB7bzIKaf801M3AnbiUlvLcMXenFORtqhWXFYJqv/N/io9DN0nQfBpr9Fyc h50MNG4yVw/5jAtlnr6pXbTHPfAzp3/mv1NsrpLR6cRhXU5PW+jqyqLM7M7ATQRZ5BkvAQgA vIxBTKdST8TjalLJ45i2VO6x6FiTuS7FNwhlWinbmLrVqBOyuMU7Foxbps0BSjSY0+6tGUfJ bUdnbZ4EzzrVT1lPpj86vv4ukj9n7XzggAZJopzTj66ghqmiUfrZu5K5ClQUtosxYiUtIO7z 1BRf1xC5UNmqFEWxafEk81AVr6Us9J7BbyW4SdMh2ReHF+zgSs1CSzjobCZ/sA4v5uYp1hiq V08ZLawLIQoKQQFDorwMDPuX0ZL2O6ux2pX9tI04pGem2JVfQwxgfoE1Tj47MIvftmlzJ5uC O1y9zpkPjw00AngJgHKaIb0Xe6z4dJKotbAygB2tD/EM+2QJfBZ7aQARAQABwsBlBBgBCAAP BQJZ5BkvAhsMBQkCky4AAAoJEBTue4osq0ou3+8IAI/lD29qvdz2qmN0O68h9sE3r7qaqTpq 9LNgNIeTEJ7H6EfO9xU7TnPrBEm49V7fBJZLhkpyhA1XDwXPFgnQU+1dln9zGmm5qRySY71y zVvttW0k9FffhqvJy8yekcBHi8LIJVGV+FhrNixICs0zzPquWKtlcTSYQt80zuLND6XQYHb+ 7nq80Ij2h9e1b3sZ34Ceo0fjvIogieVXdmrg6K/fWKZ+yKOx0LBI60wB9pzb0T7WjuO0svxt lq3NfAji6+fadgIyWCDPx0aJx0/+LXvxkK0+1c4E9KjqmEfRSR1fdwasqLN43eD7x465JIIv DaE+1+8RUdzR93Ym3iKR3/Y= Message-ID: <8ee4c749-fe60-2129-8a68-d5c861980705@members.fsf.org> Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 16:22:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 20:22:37 -0000 I've submitted what I suspect is a better patch to the ports bugzilla. Hopefully that will do it. - Wes On 05/10/18 14:42, Wes Frazier wrote: > As I tried to indicate in my first message the port has no current > maintainer. Though I suspect the fix is small, as it does build and run > correctly with tweaked cflags. > > - Wes > > On 05/10/18 12:58, Michael Sierchio wrote: >> Ah, okay. Send a message to the maintainer of the port. >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Wes Frazier >> wrote: >> >>> Maybe I didn't explain myself fully. The binary package doesn't behave >>> as expected. Something about the default CFLAGS it is being built with, >>> has an unexpected result, and the interactive Guile command prompt never >>> loads. >>> >>> You can see this yourself. If you execute the current binary package you >>> get a black area where a guile interpreter prompt should be, but there >>> is none. Expected behavior is to be greeted by "guile>" (Screenshot of >>> both behaviors attached.) >>> >>> Thats why I started investigating rebuilding it to begin with. >>> Rebuilding it with different CFLAGS corrects the issue. >>> >>> Though reading more FreeBSD documentation this shouldn't be patched in >>> the FreeBSD ports makefile like I have done. Though im not sure what the >>> propper fix is, to exclude a specific port from a global CFLAG. >>> >>> - Wes >>> >>> On 05/10/18 11:05, Michael Sierchio wrote: >>>> Why not start with the package and see if that doesn't suit your needs? >>>> >>>> gnurobots-1.2.0_12 GNU diversion wherein Scheme-coded robots >>>> explore a world >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Wes Frazier >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Im less than a month in, with using FreeBSD. >>>>> >>>>> games/gnurobots in the ports tree doesn't appear to behave as expected. >>>>> It builds and executes but doesn't actually correctly spawn the GNU >>>>> Guile interactive command prompt like it is supposed to. >>>>> >>>>> I've been able to correct it, simply by changing how the port's Makefile >>>>> was tweaking the CFLAGS manually in the package's build system. >>>>> >>>>> I have attached the patch. I however, do not know if this is the >>>>> best/correct way to fix this issue, nor do I know who to contact to get >>>>> a fix integrated into ports. (gnurobots is without maintainer.) >>>>> >>>>> Advice appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>>>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> --- >>> This email is digitally signed with GnuPG. >>> Please consider using GnuPG too to protect this >>> conversation from passive corporate surveillance. >>> >>> https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org >>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >