From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 02:52:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED5A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:52:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f7.mail.ru (f7.mail.ru [194.67.57.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15C743D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shmukler@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f7.mail.ru with local id 1CmNlA-0008C3-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:52:24 +0300 Received: from [24.185.78.105] by mac.mail.ru with HTTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:52:24 +0300 From: Igor Shmukler To: Hubert Feyrer Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [24.185.78.105] Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:52:24 +0300 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: cc: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Igor Shmukler List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:52:26 -0000 Hubert, The benchmark suite in question is not bad, but it's a microbenchmark suite. BTW, when we used the suite to tune kernel for ourt needs we had to change many things. As of a year ago some tests had to be modified, otherwise we might start tuning for the wrong goals. The title of this email and the article is NetBSD beats FreeBSD in performance should be changed to NetBSD beats FreeBSD on comprehensive microbenchmark suite. I don't remember who it was, but someone posted results of real server tests. These were in favor of FreeBSD. I doubt that much changed since last year but who knows ... Maybe NetBSD is better, but this is not something that could be concluded from a microbenchmark. IMHO. igor. -----Original Message----- From: Hubert Feyrer To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:19:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 be ats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance > > > Gregory McGarry asked me to host and advertize this paper for him: > > Abstract: ``With the recent releases of NetBSD 2.0 and FreeBSD 5.3 operating > system, many new and exciting features have been implemented. Both criticism > and commendation on performance, reliability and scalability have been directed > towards these releases. > > This paper presents a suite of benchmarks and results for comparing the > performance of these operating systems. The benchmarks target core operating > system functionality, server scalability and thread implementation. These > benchmarks are useful server-based criteria for demanding applications such as > loaded webservers, databases, and voice-over-IP (VoIP) media relays. The > results indicate that NetBSD has surpassed FreeBSD in performance on nearly > every benchmark and is poised to grab the title of the best o perating system > for the server environment.'' > > URL: http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/gmcgarry/ > > > - Hubert > > -- > NetBSD - Free AND Open! (And of course secure, portable, yadda yadda) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > http://Mail.Ru - лучшая почта с неограниченным объемом почтового ящика!