From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 01:31:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 633E8C09 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com (mail-qa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E69EC8C for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id dc16so13647810qab.1 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:31:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2AuP5z5EXfnk3zYv77sZvh1zegQaweVnOnkGFnfidfg=; b=k8SD+GMkA8Pkr95xQEqlexL1Hzarya90iPWJ8QePaA6YiCsnoZyqrPFx0spE/kOfs8 JUxwTQtCzUeWCc7vCnqcVLUgBYyuD/CRM1rlgnParKUyeM+InUAal3+mcRFZZWRRwPBt nYZCHptG7Y+xxl+0tIn2fFdgBeYJCCrPdMVWslWe7AVzShXeRgblId7n2z1LKi8xsacT uB2uwF3AJWj6Jg+HlFQ7ItVjt231zwwpR3DaCljLGMgF/rrRJ7RgKQ7YVgtYULTMhf8g NFRFEJgNhYPBWVskwQzM/NQ/abgOWg7/SsmAjQQ5i87xZ7z7SwVithQSY0k9YrmCAQhF OzhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.72.8 with SMTP id k8mr15045807qaj.26.1423272670305; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.158.137 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:31:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:31:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Is NO_PKG_REGISTER still supposed to work? From: Kimmo Paasiala To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:31:11 -0000 >From bsd.port.mk: # NO_PKG_REGISTER # - Don't register a port installation as a package. However, testing this with a port results in the port installation performing the staging part only and the final installation from the stage directory on to the system being skipped when NO_PKG_REGISTER is set. Is this still supposed to work? -Kimmo