From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 7 23:09:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D3116A420 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:09:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from p-celej@o2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx2.go2.pl [193.17.41.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F000A43D45 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:09:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from p-celej@o2.pl) Received: from [192.168.0.25] (unknown [80.50.250.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB03074807D for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:09:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43E928D4.5030500@o2.pl> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:10:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Celej?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org References: <43E7D1A2.1030008@o2.pl> <200602071048.56326.jhb@freebsd.org> <200602071237.31791.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> <200602071404.44314.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200602071404.44314.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Kernel panic with ACPI enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:09:27 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 07 February 2006 13:37, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > >> On Tuesday 07 February 2006 09:48, John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> [cut] >> I have a few things. Is there a reason you have 'device apm'? Are you >> trying to use APM and ACPI at the same time? Why do you have 'device >> isa' rather than 'device eisa'? Where you, by any chance, just re-using >> your conf file from 5.x? It kind of looks that way. Have you looked at >> i386/conf/NOTES? There is some more information in there. >> > > device isa is normal, and he probably just commented out eisa since modern > systems don't have EISA slots. The apm thing won't hurt, though it probably > adds a small bit of bloat to the kernel. If you have both apm and acpi then > acpi will be used if it is present, otherwise if acpi is not present (or is > disabled) then apm will be used. > Without 'device apm', was the same problem. I used APM instead of ACPI. But now this is never mind, the problem was solved; see above post. -- Pozdrawiam Przemysław Celej