Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:13:50 +0400 From: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com> To: Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports licenses Message-ID: <AANLkTimRVGusbIl7_YaW8w50IhRm2O1aslP8eixUIVEq@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100531131743.GA65005@atarininja.org> References: <4C02C8A7.306@freebsd.org> <20100530212944.GO216@comcast.net> <20100530214038.GB52886@atarininja.org> <AANLkTikypZCpet67DbYkJWmLmlhVnDyfbqoIXojKX-VI@mail.gmail.com> <20100531131743.GA65005@atarininja.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/5/31 Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org>: > Matthew already pointed out CHANGES. A heads-up to this list from the > author may have been nice but it really isn't that big of a deal. Maybe, > for all I know, a message to this list is coming once everything is > ironed out. > > Formal policies that mandate this kind of stuff is unnecessary in my > opinion. > >> I've also just got to know about LICENSE* from this discussion thread. >> And I'm sure my ports do not contain license information. > > Like I said, I'd wait until it is clearly documented in the canonical > source before I even begin to deal with it. I'm waiting on Porter's > Handbook documentation that tells me how to use it. Not using this new > LICENSE stuff in your ports is not harming anything right now, so just > sit tight and wait until it's properly documented. None of my ports > contain license information right now either. > > The author (alepulver@) has said in CHANGES that a PH entry will be > available soon. > > -- WXS OK, Thank you for clarification. Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-*
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimRVGusbIl7_YaW8w50IhRm2O1aslP8eixUIVEq>