From owner-cvs-all Mon Sep 17 9:36:58 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D8A37B408; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id E6791130; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:36:40 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:36:40 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: knu@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on 'Attic'. Message-ID: <20010917173640.E15600@tao.org.uk> References: <20010917115742.A11675@tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from drosih@rpi.edu on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:34:15PM -0400 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:34:15PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 11:57 AM +0100 9/17/01, Josef Karthauser wrote: > >Looking at the following commit I notice however that this was never > >done in the case of modifications to files. I'm inclined to modify the > >code to remove the word Attic here too. Opinions? >=20 > This was said in reference to: >=20 > >On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:30:18AM -0700, > > > jkh 2001/09/17 00:30:18 PDT > > > =20 > >> Revision Changes Path > >> 1.22.2.11.2.1 +3 -1 src/lib/libutil/login.conf.5 > >> 1.17.2.2.4.1 +10 -3 src/lib/libutil/login_cap.c > >> 1.3.8.1 +3 -1 src/release/sysinstall/Attic/dhcp.c > >> 1.252.2.49.2.1 +14 -2 src/release/sysinstall/Attic/menus.c > > > 1.103.2.15.2.2 +2 -2 src/release/sysinstall/Attic/tcpip.c >=20 > Actually, I'm confused on this. How is it that changes are being > made to files which have been sent into the attic? Wouldn't "in > the attic" imply "frozen"? [just curious] A file is usually put in the Attic automatically when it is removed from the HEAD branch. I'm not sure whether it's moved back out again if it's re-added there later. The Attic is an internal cvs thing and IMO isn't relevant to the commit logs. Joe --84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjumJpgACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZc4wCg5WzULZU/9fRwptIgGCVM0eRo aqgAoJ+Vu6tmqf/1V/gvg4rhtOrwZwct =9fW8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message