From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Jan 20 11:26:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA14562
          for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:26:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA14554
          for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id GAA03945; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 06:24:49 +1100
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 06:24:49 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199601201924.GAA03945@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, nate@sri.MT.net
Subject: Re: docs/164
Cc: gj@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

>Note, I removed the referecnes to PT_ATTACH/PT_DETACH since they are
>ifdef'd out of <sys/ptrace.h>, but don't we have the ability to
>attach/detach process using GDB?  If so, can someone (Gary J.) bring
>back the changes to the man-page, or at least update the include file to
>reflect reality.

gdb uses procfs for attach/detach.  Defining PT_ATTACH/PT_DETACH would
probably just cause sys_process.c to fail to compile.  There are some
old bits in there from before 1.1 (kept in case someone wants to make
them work).

Bruce