From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Aug 14 04:40:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA12523 for chat-outgoing; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 04:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA12518 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 04:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA13238; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 04:39:49 -0700 (PDT) To: Stephen Roome cc: mika ruohotie , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speed test In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:12:55 BST." Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 04:39:48 -0700 Message-ID: <13234.871558788@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > But the alpha thing is odd, what's the alpha's memory bus speed and what > byte width memory does it use. Is that 166MB/s show above approaching the I'm not sure what the bus speed is, but the memory width is 64 bit. You have to use 8 SIMMS at a time with the Durango motherboard, nothing smaller. > If so, then that alpha better not have cost more than 2000 UK pounds (or > $2000 I suppose considering the price of hardware here.) It's less than that and remains a pretty good deal. Don't forget that memory speed isn't the only benchmark it wins. :-) Jordan