Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Sep 2001 16:07:48 -0700
From:      "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
To:        "Karun" <karun@dambiec.com>, <vk@vkci.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: Oracle!
Message-ID:  <004001c138bb$141a6b00$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B9A8094.9000904@dambiec.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Karun [mailto:karun@dambiec.com]
>Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 1:33 PM
>To: vk@vkci.com
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG;
>inquiries@windriver.com; support@windriver.com
>Subject: Re: Oracle!
>
>
>Victor Kane wrote:
>
>>.
>>
>>You also failed to notice that Sun allows free downloads only for
>>non-commercial use... Should we say you've lost sight of what
>>motivates commercial software companies?
>>
>The free downloads can also be used commercialy for computers with up to
>8 cpus
>Karun
>

Thanks Karun,

  I cannot emphasize this enough.  Victor, if you need a URL please go here:

http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/binaries/index.html

  They have had over a MILLION licenses registered under this program.

  Let me just say this in regards to Oracle.  Oracle is the sole reason that
many people have Sun servers (Enterprise, etc.)  Sun is not blind to this,
and has worked closely with Oracle for years now as a result.  I'm quite sure
that a number of features have been added to Solaris specifically to assist
Oracle, you might say that Solaris has been optimized for it.

  Now that Sun has the free licensing program, I fail to see why anyone
responsible for a production Oracle server would be screwing around with any
other platform, such as Windows NT, Linux, or even FreeBSD.  And, I wrote
a damn book about FreeBSD!!!

  Frankly, there's other databases (MySQL and Postgres) that work fine on
Linux and FreeBSD, and if it's so all fired important to have a Free platform
such as FreeBSD to run your database server, then WTF are you doing with a
commercial database program like Oracle to start with?  If your "database app"
requires Oracle, then go back to the manufacturer of that app and demand they
support one of the Free database programs.

  I think your missing the boat when you say that Oracle support is necessary
to get FreeBSD in front of the CTO's of the world.  What's necessary to get in
front of the world's CTO's is an entire paradigm of switching their
infrastructure over to Free solutions like FreeBSD.

  We've seen with the example of Hotmail that it's possible with enough money
to selectively prune out the FreeBSD servers in an enterprise.  Well, when you
put an Oracle-on-Linux solution or an Oracle-on-FreeBSD solution into an
enterprise your just setting up conditions so that some day in the future some
fool is going to come in and hand-wave in front of the CTO and get that Linux
or FreeBSD server replaced with a Sun or Windows NT server.  Since they are
already paying for Oracle, slipping in a commercial operating system fee into
the budget won't raise any eyebrows.

  By contrast, if you ELIMINATE all of the commercial solutions and go
ENTIRELY to Open Source/Free Source/whatever you want to call it, then at some
point in the future, when some fool comes in, for them to replace components
of that Free solution with commercial components is going to create a huge hue
and cry.  In short, they probably won't be able to do it.  The enterprise is
more likely to react by eliminating the fool instead of switching their entire
IT infrastructure over to a set of commercial solutions.

  In summary, I've spent a lot of time working on integrating Free solutions
into commercial network infrastructures.  But, increasingly I've come to the
realization that the old idea of FreeBSD being the servers and Windows being
the desktops is not what we should be shooting for.  I'll grant the Linux
folks this much - they have figured out that getting ahold of the desktop
space is one of the keys.  Unfortunately what they have not understood is that
by emphasizing Linux support of all manner of commercial applications, they
are selling out and creating an environment where if people like Microsoft and
Sun want to get rid of them, it's pretty easy to do it - just give away the
operating system.  Microsoft already did this to put Netscape out of business,
Sun is doing it to put Linux out of business, do you want Microsoft to do it t
o FreeBSD too?!?!?


Ted Mittelstaedt                                       tedm@toybox.placo.com
Author of:                           The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide
Book website:                          http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004001c138bb$141a6b00$1401a8c0>