From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 17 07:42:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C113106566B; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A997E8FC14; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so2790592vws.13 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:42:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b8edXb2tBX/8zRF8P/59qwwBcwzBrsD6Ohlg4QJpWGo=; b=b5/rUUKOnDfi4lBitRVz91KPgrZPADxpJqCOtpcNO0xxv8fO+xx5+PJZH0KIiN9sSE CQzLU+fmQ+h7thoiTIoj67mEnT2GGAW6t0PAWU1HgS5xDroD+WO4KpKAhLJpiqJ1ASMs AdYtYjdOj68eyzLIwylusg63mxNFkRIrYH6oc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=TZi2+HYb8feZeXE+U/A7spugOgkuGmjyB0X4AzNC85Hip2KkJVI9SNIfPkE2MPDsml xb3fC8Xi6rfFDe4OzK7GF26v0fn8yXPz5qctuXirFwlAizvtLGqBF4dnPJ4zCGvx7JwE S0hbE9tvLkOketPOqZabQNp6Q7bDikxkRhgNE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.173.38 with SMTP id bh6mr1225419vdc.296.1300347747790; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.171.206 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:42:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D7F7708.1060803@entel.upc.edu> References: <4D7F7708.1060803@entel.upc.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:42:27 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dKDrYEO3DZduUpIhg_LLPDAfUzQ Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Net , freebsd-current Subject: Re: [ath] AR9285/AR2427 users - please test -HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:42:29 -0000 Nope. The AR9287 has a new EEPROM format, new calibration code and some extra tidbits here and there which I need to add. I've ordered a couple of them to add support - but I won't be doing so unti= l I find/squish bugs relating to all the earlier chipsets. :) I'm not being evil - if there's bugs w/ the earlier chipsets, it's likely that shared code will also cause problems with later chipsets. This is why I've stopped at the AR9285. That said, if someone has an AR9287 and would like to get their hands dirty= , and doesn't mind waiting a few weeks, I'd love to help you do the initial port. I can help you port the EEPROM code from ath9k and port over the calibration code. That's almost all of the easy work done. :) Adrian 2011/3/15 Gustau P=E9rez > Al 14/03/11 01:46, En/na Adrian Chadd ha escrit: > > Hi all, > > > > I've been working on AR9285 and AR2427 specific fixes. I seem to have > > fixed the issues I've seen with my AR9285 and AR2427 (and my AR2427 > > actually performs better under FreeBSD than Linux. Hah!) > > > > Just to be clear - the AR2427 support now seems to work and be stable. > > I'm seeing 24mbit in iperf TCP tests in both TX and RX test. > > > > Would people please give -head a test and report back to the list(s) ? > > > > > Will this also support AR9287 ? > > Regards and thanks for your work, > > Gustau >