From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 9 05:40:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A42C16A420 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:40:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0F543D45 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k195e7p6053415 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:40:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k195e7VK053414; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:40:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:40:07 GMT Message-Id: <200602090540.k195e7VK053414@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Boris Kovalenko Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93012: trouble with installing quagga 0.99.3 on FreeBSD-5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Kovalenko List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 05:40:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/93012; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Kovalenko To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, h@cosat.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93012: trouble with installing quagga 0.99.3 on FreeBSD-5.4 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:37:45 +0500 Hello! I've checked this root@new-ns# uname -a FreeBSD new-ns.tagnet.ru 5.4-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 #8: Mon Dec 12 13:39:45 YEKT 2005 root@new-ns.tagnet.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SERVER i386 root@new-ns# makeinfo --version makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.6 and found no problem. And I can not identify the root of this problem some people sometimes have. The only thing I may propose is to introduce WITHOUT_DOCS. Should I? With respect, Boris