From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Apr 11 11:10:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA08205
          for isp-outgoing; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA08194
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (shovey@buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA10408; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 14:10:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 14:10:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steve <shovey@buffnet.net>
To: Alan Batie <batie@agora.rdrop.com>
cc: "Darrin R. Woods" <dwoods@netgazer.com>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sprint or MCI ??
In-Reply-To: <m0wFi0r-00092fC@agora.rdrop.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970411141024.991E-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Alan Batie wrote:

> > I would have to second this opinion.  We also switched from UUNet to Sprint
> > and have been happy ever since.
> 
> I'm surprised at the dissatisfaction with UUnet... While I don't like their
> attitude towards reselling, their service has always been impeccable.

customer service yes - but when I had them my connectivity to the net was
down frequently.