From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Nov 15 12:12:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7A51C5253; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47Dxzg4nLxz3McZ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 59B35D20D; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:11:59 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ganael Laplanche Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r517647 - in head: devel/flatzebra devel/flatzebra/files games/afternoonstalker games/burgerspace games/cosmosmash Message-ID: <20191115121159.GA5289@FreeBSD.org> References: <201911151100.xAFB0Jgh013237@repo.freebsd.org> <20191115110513.GA38311@FreeBSD.org> <1706135.ZZtHBoc5uo@dmc12.centralesupelec.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1706135.ZZtHBoc5uo@dmc12.centralesupelec.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:12:00 -0000 On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Ganael Laplanche wrote: > On Friday, November 15, 2019 12:05:13 PM CET Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > This is not "clean up", patches were correctly generated before and > > now they're not. > > Not sure it needs an additional commit to fix that No, it doesn't, let's not contribute to more repochurn. > I generate my patches manually, I presume I should definitely switch > to using the makepatch target. Yes, please. ./danfe