Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:57:50 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> To: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/science/cdo Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20110829205750.GB1222@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <201108290342.p7T3gPDG082431@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201108290342.p7T3gPDG082431@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 03:42:25 +0000, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > Modified files: > science/cdo Makefile distinfo > Log: > - Update to 1.5.2 As Alexey had asked[1] last month, I too would like to understand the rationale behind using a preprocessor compiler option in CFLAGS (rather than in CPPFLAGS, which is presumably more appropriate). This is just out of my own curiosity, so please interpret it as nothing more than a reminder to consider the question. :) [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2011-July/221354.html -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110829205750.GB1222>