Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 15:34:23 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 690a4c91c944 - main - sysutils/bsdebfetch: + Simple system info tool in bash Message-ID: <CALH631kBRBrTSL_US_AhOGaX%2BibmHJmpnBsGqiPSbPM93Aggmg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2aBxSZQ4HgH3bsb%2Bc80zCjWq6iYzzCv6a5S6mOuM7pdqQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <202209291218.28TCI0G0066014@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CAGwOe2aBxSZQ4HgH3bsb%2Bc80zCjWq6iYzzCv6a5S6mOuM7pdqQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:31 PM Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Not that I complain, but how many of these do we have now in the ports? := -) > > neofetch > onefetch > pfetch > screenfetch > ufetch > > How different are they from each other? > I talked a submitter out of committing another similar one because as > he admitted, it did not add any value in terms of new features > whatsoever. > > Cheers. But on the other hand, does it hurt? The port is NO_BUILD and NO_ARCH, so the added load on our infrastructure is minimal. This also might encourage the author to contribute more.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631kBRBrTSL_US_AhOGaX%2BibmHJmpnBsGqiPSbPM93Aggmg>