Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 08:18:19 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, re <re@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l... Message-ID: <20180331131818.GA22697@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <68DEEF9A-6290-40AD-B51D-E187593C089F@FreeBSD.org> References: <201803311138.w2VBcKHP014025@repo.freebsd.org> <CAALwa8mB-FWA%2B_tKXO19x%2B9_CKy6%2B80vxqbKieEXY9fre1ZPdg@mail.gmail.com> <68DEEF9A-6290-40AD-B51D-E187593C089F@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 02:42:01PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > It's been almost 3 months now since clang 6 landed in head, and if > those ports require USE_CXXSTD=gnu++98 to be fixed, why haven't those > already been changed already? Because it takes a lot of time and effort to do it? This basically torpedoes the work I've been trying to do to catch tier-2 up to tier-1, on 11. I had been trying to to identify all the problems that existed beforehand, before starting in on the clang6 ones. (Many people have also been contributing to fixing clang6/amd64/current errors, and I wanted to let the work settle, and not duplicate.) Finally, if this had gone in just two days later, it would not have affected the Q2 package builds. I could have lived with that a lot more easily. I am very disappointed in the timing of this change. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180331131818.GA22697>