From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 11 21:09:55 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4D61065671;
	Sun, 11 May 2008 21:09:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de)
Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0218FC14;
	Sun, 11 May 2008 21:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de)
Received: by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id BE9362D2BF9; Sun, 11 May 2008 23:09:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (nox@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4BL80Kn046804;
	Sun, 11 May 2008 23:08:00 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de)
Received: (from nox@localhost)
	by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.6/Submit) id m4BL7xRH046803;
	Sun, 11 May 2008 23:07:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox)
From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 23:07:59 +0200
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080511210759.GB46475@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>,
	Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
References: <20080511160748.GA38480@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
	<20080511192745.6F3625B4D@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<20080511193302.GA18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080511193302.GA18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 11 May 2008 21:59:15 +0000
Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: seems I finally found what upset kqemu on amd64 SMP... shared
	gdt! (please test new patch :)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 21:09:55 -0000

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:33:02PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:27:45PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote:

> > [...]
> > 5. An initial getty gets killed as it "exceeded maximum CPU limit"
> >    This could an emulation bug or related to time issues.
> The #5 usually means the thread' kernel stack overflow.
> 
Oh I didn't know that.  You could test a kernel with KSTACK_PAGES increased
to verify...

	Juergen