From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  2 21:26:06 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3C2106564A
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Sep 2012 21:26:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0B58FC0C
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Sep 2012 21:26:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org>) id 1T8HgB-0002oj-FM
	for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:26:03 +0200
Received: from cpe-188-129-82-176.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.82.176])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:26:03 +0200
Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-82-176.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim
	0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:26:03 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:25:38 +0200
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <k20isv$k9q$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-82-176.dynamic.amis.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
Subject: UFS and ACLs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:26:06 -0000

Hi,

Can someone give an estimated / expected answer on these questions:

* What is the performance impact (if any) for file systems mounted with
either of the ACL options: acls, nfsv4acls, in the situation where most
of the files do not have (and do not need) any ACLs?

* Will the kernel automagically add ACLs (other than the regular Unix
DAC bits) to new files on file systems mounted with acls/nfsv4acls?

* The "regular" DAC bits have some nice propagation rules, e.g. new
files created by a user belonging to a group which owns the directory
have the GID of this group. Does this work with ACLs?

* Which is the easier option to use/maintain, POSIX or NFSv4 ACLs?