Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:28:03 +0200
From:      Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?
Message-ID:  <20050719092803.GA10127@stack.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20050608180428.GA42445@stack.nl>
References:  <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> <200506080908.02478.fcash@ocis.net> <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> <6.2.1.2.0.20050608134054.06b8ccb0@64.7.153.2> <20050608180428.GA42445@stack.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:04:28PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> > >I remember 5.2.1 panicking left and right, on several machines, it was
> > >completely unusable.  Maybe we just live in different universes.
> >=20
> > Me too, but a lot has changed since 5.2.1 which at the time was I think=
 was=20
> > called a preview.  The topic is 5.4R.  What parts of the OS do you feel=
 are=20
> > not production ready as compared to 4.X ?
>=20
> Personnally, when upgrading from 4.x to 5.x, we ran into the following
> 3 issues that are still not fixed in 5.4:
>=20
> kern/80617:
> Hangup writing large blocks to NFS mounted FS    (Patches available)
> Not exremely important: just don't do that.
>=20
> kern/79208:
> i387 libm's floorf(), ceilf() and truncf()       (Fixed in RELENG_5)
> PITA when running threaded calculations.
>=20
> kern/78824
> socketpair()/close() race condition              (Fixed in CURRENT)
> Patch will be MFC'd to RELENG_5 soon.
>=20
> Anyway: you won't catch me running an unpatched 5.4 system... I'd say
> stick with RELENG_5 for the time being.

Since I can't seem to keep any recent RELENG_5 kernel up and running
atm. I'd change my viewpoint to run 5.4 and apply all necessary
stability patches yourself. I'll prepare a patchset...

Marc

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFC3MejezjnobFOgrERAlyPAJ9VF3v4Q1qbJx0Ng2M2Kz1H9GAdlQCfcoYM
YdcHgY92C3BP5sblSUvFh0s=
=zBzG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050719092803.GA10127>