From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 2 20:20:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC0A16A420 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:20:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D1843D55 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:20:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k02KKpbP058981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:20:51 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k02KKoJ3058979; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:20:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:20:50 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20060102202050.GA58502@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <005001c60f69$2dfff650$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <20060102101157.GA63949@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20060102195327.p8kxba7sgs40swg8@netchild.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060102195327.p8kxba7sgs40swg8@netchild.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: current@freebsd.org, Matt Emmerton Subject: Re: Candidates for inclusion in DEFAULTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:20:56 -0000 On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:53:27PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Divacky Roman wrote: > > >I have patch in queue which removes dependancy of linuxator on COMPAT_43 > >(hysteria.sk/~neologism/linux43.patch) - its tested on amd64/i386 but > >havent > >tried alpha (not even building it - anyone willing to test this?) > > Is this more recent than your PR? Maybe I get time this week to test (and > commit) it on x86/"make universe"). yes.. the alpha support was added - but its "blind" support - as I didnt test it at all. I just know I use this patch on my i386 machine without ANY problems for a couple of months and people reported me that amd64 works as well... if someone is willing to test alpha and/or amd64 I think its almost commitable (phk@ did a quick review of the patch) roman