From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 18:33:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EFB37B447 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:16:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E812306C; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:16:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id CD68E9F10C; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:11:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:48:03 +0100 From: Martin Faxér To: Wilko Bulte Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-Id: <20020212021146.CD68E9F10C@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100 Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > > > seeing for performance when they run current. > > > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE > > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled > > in -current. > > I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has WC enabled as well. -STABLE has it enabled indeed, but -CURRENT does not (afaik). Read what he said. :-) > > -- > | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org > |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message