From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 19 23:38:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA02596 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:38:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from luke.cpl.net (luke.cpl.net [209.150.92.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA02587 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:38:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shawn@luke.cpl.net) Received: from localhost (shawn@localhost) by luke.cpl.net (8.8.8/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA02363; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:37:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:37:16 -0800 (PST) From: Shawn Ramsey To: Tom cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pthreads vs. pthreads In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I have an application which requires pthreads that I'd like to use on > FreeBSD 2.2.5-stable > > Which is better, libc_r or mit-pthread? I think that the libc_r > stuff had some compatibility problems. What is the status of this stuff > in 2.2.5-stable? In General, I am not sure. I am using libc_r with MySQL with no problems. I do believe MIT threads are slower though... I am not sure about compatibility of libc_r, like I said I am using it with a fairly simple MySQL database. (used with Isp Admin, a nifty Java application for ISPs - www.hurl.net) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message