From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 18:55:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C9210656D4; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201F48FC15; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n59IHNGB059887; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:17:23 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n59IHNiP059886; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:17:23 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:17:23 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20090609181723.GA59598@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <86d49eocwx.fsf@kopusha.onet> <20090608181728.GU1927@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4A2EA533.1040405@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A2EA533.1040405@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Kostik Belousov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mikolaj Golub Subject: Re: Assertion lock == sq->sq_lock failed at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:327 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:55:34 -0000 On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:08:51AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > This is fixed in HEAD by r185647. I did not merged it to 7, because I > > do not believe that somebody runs stable with INVARIANTS on :). > > I would imagine that people doing kernel module development for use in > -stable systems do that with regularity. I generally run STABLE with INVARIANTS and lots of other debug options while trying to debug a panic or hang in STABLE. And I expect it won't add another panic. Eugene Grosbein