From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Oct 17 10:24:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA24115 for smp-outgoing; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from eharden.com (eharden.com [207.193.60.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA24092 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 10:24:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bad@uhf.wireless.net) Received: from uhf.wireless.net (pp8.eharden.com [207.193.60.154]) by eharden.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA20765; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 12:29:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (bad@localhost) by uhf.wireless.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA07780; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 13:26:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 13:26:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Bernie Doehner To: "TEO, WILFRED SENGKAR " cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > 1. Is it possible to use the FreeBSD 2.2.1 release with a dual Pentium II > SuperMicro P6DKF motherboard with only one CPU, or do I need the 3.0-current > snaps? The computer keeps locking up when I tried it. No. You need 3.0-current or recent SNAP. > 2. I am using a Toshiba XM-3801B SCSI drive on the same cable as two SCSI > drives on an Adaptec 3940UW, is there a conflict? Are they on different SCSI ID's? Bernie