From nobody Fri Oct 27 18:28:22 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SHB4T6Crfz4yXp9 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SHB4T5n6Pz3cnP; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1698431305; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nSLgLjtGPNaMNcQZfxnf7QQlgxds+/ZeGHTI2ZW++qg=; b=oZkjwxP9I5r4q0UkKskE+DViZNN6IlE8r8h1YfLCcUQRNN8SXHSAhI2rKtVwr1uZtJg/ey ReF3WyFwWLojPwoMHBNy716YyedJHgj//i8Ote5hmIde1sXX71SvKsY/CFm3vpxQsZXi2/ SRLDFUBIVKjWlCvENEwdvb5PgPOdtqHe6XgcpxR/soOcgAF0+M9IdHjqEFu9/xXx0fMc91 dsGyijFwk/l98R7Pjkf5200iUzkia6kfwrjleNBqbEzSD0q//Pl8k77HD+eRqema4a1vNo NR27tASkL07+LcSwTKbwI2WiA/bUOGQZU7d4vsCMJcFaCrXefuFDQQQSwK0x5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1698431305; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nSLgLjtGPNaMNcQZfxnf7QQlgxds+/ZeGHTI2ZW++qg=; b=yC/nh+mmSjrP5B3e3OYL1FJP5Urg3xxJrhktUTtM9kJt2mcG9+6ImwDSdc8S71WK1jwOvF GAf3krU25i48tQ6R4eNSy+R68qz6wYXhPnZrQZ0uZXHUzwbMvRSt3IFGLUae3aiBja0KdC h5/lSATcgSytAGjXKj2EmPGK5GG3UlSkSiAf9roFNFg3o7TnbHrYwXkaB0JQz0rqAdB8Wm BRcACubqFiDLwAl5z9r0UMMK0e32tsLsl+kv6B9CVe54DbmPr5uAm5we7x7w6UpXAfOxtz D86pMXSD6LXhxByFN/BskzULWuzx0RNqCD7An7xNVm4UVkdoJryAZEZA4Fu/PA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1698431305; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XZWVuWOFKTPwAkHEoBoB6DJH4UCUSWZkhJPWIxHrl5VnUt7pOmGToXpjtbbfHI5BkUSg44 XAKD5WTL0XcM7T0xpTcAflIO9+t+JvsAMXxKilKuvJpcWYI9W/p+g0vbILL2r5Do55ANtj JfJ/A8iNivwCu3/pM2JwrFEEy66hR16whNjiYzMzGYktvlxFlhR/fkirlNZiAchiGgA0X3 a8OEk2H7EB5bmE/14ustIlSnp2cQjkgmv450BVX88/W9cYDHFLYuHMqgQ7Ab7gtbj6BRI3 A+JZ/jEBvpLqoit7q2D00V3f0+BdKrxvluWjSoIYFmugxr9dR3jTnHBRDPZ+xA== Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC56139B2; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:22 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm Subject: Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too) Message-ID: <20231027182822.GF1289@FreeBSD.org> References: List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5wdX5gfZV4kojQYf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --5wdX5gfZV4kojQYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:35:39PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.= html > [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)] >=20 > reported (note "RPI"): >=20 > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD >=20 > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.= html > [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ] >=20 > reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"): >=20 > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64 > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD >=20 >=20 Last week, RPI succeeded while PINE64 failed. This week, the opposite occurred. Glen --5wdX5gfZV4kojQYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEjRJAPC5sqwhs9k2jAxRYpUeP4pMFAmU8AUYACgkQAxRYpUeP 4pOxUw//bQJ6FJwltP0Jofhvo5Nb1v/Dr5ECK7xYfIL/lLmKyx/tjtJqXMWt1riQ 3zlG/bq61nqArBXC8m0mf0Qj61uhsvNvAfFbJ8/61uBBmBC82+jDZYO3DdfhqWqK qf8YvDzoN7tyEgevIRHFz27C9PuKbU8WXOwu4sgflrAUP2/8mdvCfnnSa5pfRkJs JybBW5plcsmKI4LEPRHsmvvU+TQYoxbx2m6h9ERH/Y8sNnd6MRo4e8WFhXVZCBys ZnqS4BjBXhfRgdjHXVh7pSZXu3f1ZW1pm0A/5PboMSPp4hYS4KJVdC2Oy8++EyXi tyHhB8cHRG5Ccm4GTd0cDf+mMO/iVVJZ9wAJAPrQeNFSU93nu0V7j0DsMk9KM46o 7wFDaYvMTsDxQXRvan5Po7USeK6vJk7SHydzYkuKpxFAMMFQ8rA86JdHonFfOMZc 5F87uiqTU5XdsaOToJmAYdf0z/9Ibcz90+8h+muclE5SMZWbK0UHkw/Nj5Puhb1u Zilmi0XB7a5uujt96KV79aiPQofaZu8n4V4DJiHN7GpCoGdnrim/uVYrsSpB4MYy vYTnlQUWl0o1s3IqAur7Bho1qnRjzSP9p1UwqT8F11zcAuT+4adj97yroivyGZPr +MhSabvqwXt/BlJk/xSSTsyMrgC7FXhtuz8P+4KSHwrUoDO2dOU= =FA/q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5wdX5gfZV4kojQYf--