From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 21:43:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6234616A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5664E43D6D for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:43:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 445F40B6000252D4 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:43:20 +0200 Received: (qmail 76024 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 23:43:19 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 8 May 2006 23:43:19 +0200 Received: (qmail 21392 invoked by uid 1001); 8 May 2006 23:43:19 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 23:43:19 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Sideris Michael Message-ID: <20060508214319.GA21378@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Sideris Michael , Gary Jennejohn , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20060508205703.GA11215@daemons.gr> <200605082120.k48LKxSi006193@peedub.jennejohn.org> <20060508213035.GA73976@daemons.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060508213035.GA73976@daemons.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Gary Jennejohn , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports structure and improvement suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:43:30 -0000 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:30:35AM +0300, Sideris Michael wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:20:59PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > > Sideris Michael writes: > > > > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:47:51PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > No one is taking away any rights. > > > > > > Of course. That's why every ports should have a configuration panel. > > > > > > > Wrong. I do not intend to convert any of my ports to use OPTIONS so > > don't bother sending me patches. Many ports are so simple that adding > > a configuration panel would be totally unnnecessary and ridiculous. > > So, if you have 10 of this ports as dependencies, you prefer go seperately > to each port directory and search through the Makefile to find what KNOBS > it provides. Nice. Even for ports that do use the OPTIONS framework you often have to search through the Makefiles anyway to find out exactly what each option actually does. Using OPTIONS will not gain you much in this regard. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se