From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 30 01:58:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97661106566C; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACEC8FC0C; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxk36 with SMTP id 36so1500350yxk.13 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:58:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ATj6B1MwTiKNhiNmgC+k/fdDrp3TCMDlJbRynJHwM8s=; b=OTDZ5GsvD2TpcT9s8qEz5I49BkV5Lmxdx4YmKZClaS7julmEPlgaZ1vHI8N+ejnjcp 1SzYUrD0LQpZWM3lspXYGCR5U03mqx0jL4toRhOv4fJUMsnvS73T+uOLtQuepDleooQo FFTDTGZ1Xk/ZVR2uPX6fzUdV3JcY+V9lW8ECI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.124.97 with SMTP id w61mr67917967yhh.106.1317347911415; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.42 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:58:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8662kcigif.fsf@kopusha.home.net> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:58:31 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SjLlv861DhVRbu878Ym5TaQ7_7s Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: dave jones Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mikolaj Golub , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "K. Macy" , Arnaud Lacombe Subject: Re: Kernel panic on FreeBSD 9.0-beta2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:58:32 -0000 On 30 September 2011 09:04, dave jones wrote: > What are you waiting for? The issue is reproducible. If you're running > FreeBSD 9 with Mikolaj's test_udp program, you'll get the kernel panic. > I think sysadmins won't be happy about this... Well, the people familiar with the network stack need to weigh in. I'll poke Robert Watson and see what he thinks. Adrian