From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 26 07:14:27 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3857106566B;
	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:14:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.214.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8974C8FC15;
	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:14:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so1927711iwn.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:14:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=vG5k4jkfEBDNFl+wpzBs4i5Q5LhAwzRI/qrNiAZydik=;
	b=Ziauh82kCorRaTsRibuPT2y5I++uxbhTFocRaotUPWnYie1E1BcqY6/81x3a8maVZ7
	uNhOx3uGlNX/rRh0/3fhIi1hYtvqYLw9QRMCsM2dwCUIZItp+EnQe/kmJ/aT53JdtckE
	f8oEr7JzkJ49XMmCnCiMPFgCE5ZCBAkdFMrro=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=IZiKU/PJPA3xsiqOc/18tp/B2oAhNV1asdRXNbMoB80g6VaFNXHbQIBVaX2R75dxIm
	u+r6uE9ekZvV3EYE+0zQh1oX0LfbLuqGeXhoTVPuEfC46nQKewdDUQpvumoGCB7gV/wZ
	MMov7GFGNb0u8oSDiAcSmrVuVz4R5HdRPHli8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.176.1 with SMTP id bc1mr1869365icb.323.1298704466443; Fri,
	25 Feb 2011 23:14:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.165.135 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:14:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201102261159157631491@yahoo.com.cn>
References: <AANLkTi=HW4XqZ3PTB69fL5h-Qpqpae4C2sfLLdJSFxrs@mail.gmail.com>
	<201102231218136253955@yahoo.com.cn>
	<AANLkTinD+7Xo0RRZH818+M9cLKNYhC0eKAsVZPJbR1GK@mail.gmail.com>
	<201102231404144686577@yahoo.com.cn>
	<AANLkTik3x0qzffoizHMhfsOrYVG9UWKzyY7wf3pKO5QL@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim0NFT2GrhMq77=K-=-4Q6xnh7saHy3c-Bid03N@mail.gmail.com>
	<201102261159157631491@yahoo.com.cn>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:14:26 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinPX3+xM_iXO8WX92zUGrrpXo8En+q3Vyd3Z9+b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
To: beezarliu <beezarliu@yahoo.com.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
	Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>,
	"bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" <bug-followup@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: kern/150516: [em] e1000 receive queue handling problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:14:27 -0000

Hi,

2011/2/25 beezarliu <beezarliu@yahoo.com.cn>:
> Raising nmbcluster is not best way, but it can ease the memory shortage,
> and allcate more for network, which also improve system performance.
>
sure, but the driver should still be able to deals with such condition
without stalling. :)

 - Arnaud