From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jun  2 17:41:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA23365
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 17:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA23360
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 17:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA08815; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 17:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: Andrew Herdman <andrew@why.whine.com>
cc: Hal Snyder <hal@vailsys.com>,
        Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: What's wrong with a bootable CDROM??? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jun 1997 19:29:12 EDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95.970602192817.1126A-100000@why> 
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 17:39:45 -0700
Message-ID: <8811.865298385@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Speaking of problems with the bootable CD-ROM.  If you boot off the first
> disk, you can't insert the fixit cdrom (cd drawer is locked).  And you
> can't boot off the fixit cdrom.... *sigh*  maybe next time.

"Interesting." :-)

I didn't think the boot process would lock the CDROM this way; I suppose
I could make the 2nd CD bootable without too much trouble.  Would people
prefer that?

					Jordan