From owner-freebsd-security Sat Nov 13 19:39:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from trooper.velocet.net (trooper.velocet.net [216.126.82.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E204014E6A for ; Sat, 13 Nov 1999 19:39:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dgilbert@trooper.velocet.net) Received: (from dgilbert@localhost) by trooper.velocet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA04353; Sat, 13 Nov 1999 22:39:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dgilbert) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14382.11991.536272.989358@trooper.velocet.net> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 22:39:03 -0500 (EST) To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sandboxed bind. In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I went through the motions to sandbox bind. My only real complaint was that named-xfer was dynamically loaded (greatly increasing the cruft that had to be in the sandbox). Is there an easy way to determine exactly what libraries are required by an executable, BTW? Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dgilbert@velocet.net | equal if and only if they | |http://www.velocet.net/~dgilbert | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message