From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Apr 30 00:12:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E43B2C74B2 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CG5r05FFz410F; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03U0Bpo4094125 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:11:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 03U0Bo8n094124; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:11:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:11:50 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Mark Millard Cc: Glen Barber , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble booting the April 23 snapshot for rpi3 Message-ID: <20200430001150.GA94067@www.zefox.net> References: <20200428195759.GA7169@www.zefox.net> <46FAA17D-6104-4DAC-A0AA-63ED4DDD72DC@yahoo.com> <20200428201722.GI9584@FreeBSD.org> <20200428214013.GB7169@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49CG5r05FFz410F X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.13 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.63)[-0.634,0]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.05)[ip: (0.22), ipnet: 50.1.16.0/20(0.11), asn: 7065(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.82)[0.815,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:12:01 -0000 On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:10:58PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > So, unless the snapshot process built these from more recent > source, the snapshot would not have Kyle's changes and the > old problems would exist. Is it certain Kyle's patches made it into -current? With my thanks! bob prohaska >