From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 29 18:55:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A881B1065675 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbergstrom@pathscale.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867208FC14 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so1282778pwj.13 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 11:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.80.1 with SMTP id h1mr1720837wal.116.1275159347706; Sat, 29 May 2010 11:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.101] ([119.42.86.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 33sm31792430wad.8.2010.05.29.11.55.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 29 May 2010 11:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C01647A.4060903@pathscale.com> Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 02:01:14 +0700 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=F6m=22?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Jacob References: <4C0108F1.5050004@pathscale.com> <20100529160155.GA3519@anja> <4C013E24.6020204@pathscale.com> <4C015CE5.1050602@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <4C015CE5.1050602@feral.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Announcing PathDB X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 18:55:48 -0000 Matthew Jacob wrote: > On 5/29/2010 9:17 AM, "C. Bergström" wrote: >> >> >> Can someone in the FreeBSD community please talk with this guy. If >> you're going to send a snotty email at least be brave enough to do it >> publicly.. > Sorry for his rudeness. > >> >> fwiw.. I never said free anywhere in my email.. It's assumed testing >> has a reciprocal benefit assuming we fix bugs. I've spoken with 5-10 >> people in the BSD community and most are supportive of our idea.. >> They of course wanted the BSD license from the start, but to me this >> is a conservative approach which I saw as a win/win.. So honestly am >> I on crack? >> >> _ > > I don't think any of us really know what your product is. I certainly > never knew about it. Apologies.. I didn't really expect anyone to know about it. To me the best way to describe it is similar to gdb, but much cleaner codebase. > > In any case, this list is for discussions for people who are actively > working on FreeBSD itself, so perhaps this place isn't the best place > for discussing your company's work. We're announcing this under a few assumptions #1 It's going to be relicensed to something BSD community finds acceptable. .(not GPL anything) #2 It's going to be ported BSD #3 It'll end up in ports #4 We'll take feedback for features like how to implement kernel level debugging and see if we can help with it I hope this helps clarify a little.. Thanks ./C