From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 2 06:31:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B3816A4CE for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 06:31:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.systemrage.org (tor-13-peer1.clevernetsolutions.com [69.28.226.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0787743D77 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 06:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cflecknell@systemrage.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.systemrage.org [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.systemrage.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3191A6AA for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 02:31:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.systemrage.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (to-web-01.systemrage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72852-07 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 02:30:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fleckstation (d141-31-7.home.cgocable.net [24.141.31.7]) by mx1.systemrage.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659331A6A9 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 02:30:47 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Flecknell" To: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 02:30:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <200408020420.i724KNBR041846@freefall.freebsd.org> Thread-Index: AcR4SB4HDSsF0UllQyqqtNhh7bwSTAAEeCWw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149 Message-Id: <20040802063047.659331A6A9@mx1.systemrage.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at systemrage.org Subject: NIC Drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 06:31:29 -0000 Random question, Is there any advantage of using an xl(3com) NIC vs. the built-in HME NIC on an Ultra10? Or vice versa.. Chris Flecknell Systemrage.org cflecknell@systemrage.org