Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 01:30:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, <cvs-all@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES files options src/sys/geom/bde g_bde.c g_bde.h g_bde_crypt.c g_bde_lock.c g_bde_work.c Message-ID: <20021020012656.Y42990-100000@patrocles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <200210191702.g9JH2JrM062903@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > phk 2002/10/19 10:02:19 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/conf NOTES files options > Added files: > sys/geom/bde g_bde.c g_bde.h g_bde_crypt.c > g_bde_lock.c g_bde_work.c Ok, I know we have WITNESS to tell us when locks are being used incorrectly, and PHKmalloc is nice in that it helps locate malloc errors... but... but... Did we REALLY need to turn BDE into a part of the kernel? He is pretty good at catching subtle code bugs, but I think that developers may get slightly annoyed when they start getting messages about style bugs in their console log. Well, I guess this isn't too bad. At least the BDE module is a bit more friendly than the MOD_RMS subsystem they're including in Linux 2.5. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021020012656.Y42990-100000>