Date: Sun, 8 Oct 1995 17:26:35 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Cc: terry@lambert.org, bde@zeta.org.au, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs LKM broken now! Message-ID: <199510090026.RAA07545@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <HkrS6UmmI9@ache.dialup.demos.ru> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Oct 9, 95 03:05:09 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >This is a kernel linking issue. If the kernel is supposedly exporting > >these services, then they must exist regardless of whetheror not they > >are used. > > >The X11 code gets around this by causing references in a function code > >body for which the function itself is never called, but for which the > >object module being included is mandatory. > > Ok, I like this variant. Who is our LKM commiter(s) to address this > discussion? Garett Wollman. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510090026.RAA07545>