From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 19 23:43:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA12550 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 23:43:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from green.irrelevant.com (rodonnell.cwcmultimedia.co.uk [195.44.34.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA12524 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 23:43:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@jellybaby.ml.org) Received: from green ([192.168.0.4]) by green.irrelevant.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# 0-0U10L2S100) with SMTP id AAA257 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 07:44:20 +0000 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980120074418.00c65460@localhost> X-Sender: robert@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 07:44:18 +0000 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Rob Subject: bsdi compatibility & post.office Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi there. I'm fairly new to FreeBSD, like it's only been on here for two days, but I've been playing about with unix variants for a while now. I am presently running a NT4 server which I want rid of, so am moving all it's functionality to an old 486 running FreeBSD 2.2.5. So far, everything is going great, apart from one small problem. The mail suite I am using under NT is post.office (www.software.com) and while they don't have a FreeBSD version, they do have a BSDi version which I have had one or two minor problems running.. After locating a library it needed (/shlib/libc_s.2.1.0) and installing it, it worked perfectly, up to the point of actually using it. Three of the modules it loads at runtime report an error: Dispatch:Notification:Local Module (Mailbox-Deliver) Failed the verify environment test. Everythign else works - I can talk to it's web interface; it accepts smtp mail and lets me fetch it via pop3, so it must be nearly right.. but, among other things, it won't let me delete the default users it created because the above mentioned module fails. Anybody got any ideas? I've searched the mailing archives, and the web generally, but havn't come up with anything that might explain what might be happening. Thanks, Rob O'Donnell. PS: I've subbed to this list, but not had an ack back yet, so a cc: of any replies would be appreciated, just in case.