From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Dec  5 23:58:06 1996
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA04049
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 23:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id XAA04032
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 23:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA02388; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 23:56:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612060756.XAA02388@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAXLOGNAME in struct eproc 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Dec 1996 11:59:27 +1100."
             <199612050059.LAA28925@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 23:56:47 -0800
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>`struct eproc' has 4 "spare" bytes following e_login[MAXLOGNAME].  I
>think this should have been removed when MAXLOGNAME was increased by 4.

   Actaully it's 4 spare longs. I just told Jordan to decrease it to 3.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project