From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 5 8: 0: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d179.as0.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.130.181]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BD737B420; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 07:59:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (silby@localhost) by patrocles.silby.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g15A3EV01685; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:03:14 GMT (envelope-from silby@silby.com) X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:03:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Daniel Lang , Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autotuning kernel vars In-Reply-To: <20020205094939.A1617-100000@patrocles.silby.com> Message-ID: <20020205100134.B1617-100000@patrocles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > LINT says, and I quote: > > # > # The `maxusers' parameter controls the static sizing of a number of > # internal system tables by a formula defined in subr_param.c. Setting > # maxusers to 0 will cause the system to auto-size based on physical > # memory. > # Hmph, apologies. I was not aware of the comment in LINT that suggested setting nmbclusters / nbuf to 0. This comment predates the autoscaling code, and is wrong. I'll go remove it. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message